The Retention of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Trinidad and Tobago: An Ongoing Human Rights Concern
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56784/hrgs.v1i1.4Keywords:
Caribbean Court of Justice, Death penalty, Human rights, The rights to life, Trinidad and TobagoAbstract
Commonwealth Caribbean countries account for a significant portion (roughly 15%) of the Global South region. The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago (“Trinidad and Tobago”) is the lone Commonwealth Caribbean country that retains the mandatory death penalty on its statute book in defiance of its human rights obligations. The retention of this anti-human rights punishment is due, in large measure, to decisions from Trinidad and Tobago’s final court of appeal, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (“JCPC”), which has affirmed the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty. This article comparatively evaluates the jurisprudence on the mandatory death penalty from the JCPC and its regional counterpart, the Caribbean Court of Justice (“CCJ”), to demonstrate that while the CCJ rightly places a premium on the protection of human rights, the posture of the JCPC severely threatens the respect, protection, and fulfillment of human rights. The article argues that the most recent judicial decision from the JCPC on the mandatory death penalty continues to afford Trinidad and Tobago a free pass to disregard its international human rights obligations indefinitely. It further argues that this state of affairs is wholly censurable for a civilized nation that supposedly has respect for the fundamental rights of the individual. Consequently, the Parliament of Trinidad and Tobago should take the only corrective action remaining, which is to abolish the mandatory death penalty by legislative intervention.
References
Adeleye, N. (2021). The Death Row Phenomenon: A Prohibition Against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment. https://perma.cc/2TWV-43HS]
A.I.(X.W.) v. Russia, (2015)
Al-Saadon & Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, (2010)
American Civil Liberties Union. (2022). The Case Against the Death Penalty. American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/other/case-against-death-penalty
Amnesty International. (2022). Death Sentences and Executions 2021. //www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/5418/2022/en/
Bingham, L. (2007). The Rule of Law. The Cambridge Law Journal, 66(1), 75 & 81–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4500873
Boyce and Joseph v R (Barbados), Para. 31 (2004)
Boyce et.al. v Barbados, (2007)
Caesar v. Trinidad and Tobago, (2005)
Caserta, S., Madsen, M. (2016). Between Community Law and Common Law: The Rise of the Caribbean Court of Justice at the Intersection of Regional Integration and Post-colonial Legacies. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79(89), 90. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol79/iss1/4
Censer, J. R. (2019a). Intellectual History and the Causes of the French Revolution. Journal of Social History, 52(3), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shy082
Censer, J. R. (2019b). The French Revolution is Not Over: An Introduction. Journal of Social History, 52(3), 543–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shy081
Deinhammer, R. (2019). The Rule of Law: Its Virtues and Limits. Obnovljeni Život, 74(1), 35. oz072sve.indd (srce.hr)
Dewan, L. (2001). Thomas Aquinas, Gerard Bradley, and the Death Penalty: Some Observations. Gregorianum, 82(1), 149–165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23580421
Ebury, K. (2021). Modern Cultures of the Death Penalty (pp. 1–27). https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-52750-1_1 Eyre, C. (1984). Crime and Adultery in Ancient Egypt. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/030751338407000113
Fox v The Queen, (2002)
Francis, P. (2018). Message Of His Holiness Pope Francis For World Communications Day
Fratelli Tutti, (2020)
Griffin, T. (2021). Comparing expert versus general public rationale for death penalty support and opposition: Is expert perspective on capital punishment consistent with “disciplined retention”? Punishment & Society, 23(4), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211029370
Hilaire, Constantine and Benjamin et al. v. Trinidad and Tobago, (2001)
Human Rights Act, (1998)
Jay Chandler v The State (No. 2) (Trinidad and Tobago), (2022)
Kalmanson, M. (2022). Death After Dobbs: Addressing the Viability of Capital Punishment for Abortion. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4159846
Kilcommins, S. (1973). Doctrinal Legal Method (Black-Letterism): assumptions, commitments and shortcomings. Professor Kingsfield, The Paper Chase.
Kim, C. and LeBlang, T. (1975). The Death Penalty In Traditional China. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 5
Kindler v. Canada (Minister of Justice), (1991)
Knowles, J. (2015). The Abolition of the Death Penalty in the United Kingdom: How it Happened and Why it Still Matters. The Death Penalty Project, 1(67), 6. https://dpproject.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/DPP-50-Years-on-pp1- 68-1.pdf
Langer, M., Vasilopoulos, P., McAvay, H., & Jost, J. T. (2020). System justification in France: liberté, égalité, fraternité. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004
Méndez, J. (2012). The Death Penalty and the Absolute Prohibition of Torture and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, (2012) 2:6. Human Rights Brief 20, No 1, 2(6), 2
Murder (Abolition of the Death Penalty) Bill, (1964)
Nervais & Severin v The Queen, (2018)
Matthew v The State, 35 (2004). https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5b2897fe2c94e06b9e19ec11
Nasir Sitompul, M., & Sitompul, A. (2022). Execution of Death Penalty in Narcotics Crime in the Perspective of National Law in Indonesia. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 1(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i2.19
Novak, A. (2021). Hanging and the mandatory death penalty in Africa: the significance of Rajabu v Tanzania. African Human Rights Yearbook / Annuaire Africain Des Droits de l’Homme, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29053/2523-1367/2021/v5a18
Offences Against the Person (Amendment) Act, (2018). 194e20f4c24596f073bf72414faae7d5.pdf (barbadosparliament.com)
Parisi, F., & Ginsburg, T. (2021). The Role of Comparative Law in the Social Sciences: An Introduction. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 69(4), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avab018
Pagdayawon Rolando v Phillipines, (2004)
Peter Laughlin. (2014). Jesus and the Cross: Necessity, Meaning, and Atonement (1st ed.). The Lutterworth Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cgf285
Pipersburgh v The Queen, (2008)
Raz, J. (1979). The Rule of Law and Its Virtue. In Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality.
Reichel, P. L. (2022). Death Penalty and Capital Punishment in Comparative Perspective. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.626
Republic v. Mbushuu and Others, (1994)
Reyes v The Queen, (2002)
Roald Dijkstra. (2020). The Early Reception and Appropriation of the Apostle Peter (60-800). The Anchors of the Fisherman. (Roald Dijkstra (ed.)). Brill
Robinson, F. (1945). Where and When Did Peter Die? Journal of Biblical Literature 1 June 1945;, 64(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3262446
Roger Judge v Canada, (2003) Roodal v The State, (2003)
S v. Makwanyane Another, (1995)
Šavelka, J., & Ashley, K. D. (2022). Legal information retrieval for understanding statutory terms. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(2), 245–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09293-5
Sr Bernadette Mary Reis, fsp. (2017). Pope Francis begs for end to death penalty through an ethic of caring. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2018-12/pope-death penalty-begs-end-ethic-caring.html#:~:text=The Pope affirmed the Church’s,and dignity of the person”
Sury, A. (2020). Qualifying for Protection Under the Convention Against Torture, Practice Advisory. https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/resources/cat_advisory-04.2020.pdf The Queen v Hughes (2002), (2002)
Tittemore, B. (2004). The Mandatory Death Penalty in the Commonwealth Caribbean and the Inter- American Human Rights System: An Evolution in the Development and Implementation of International Human Rights Protections. Wm. & Mary Bill Rts., 13(445), 464–465. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol13/iss2/7
United Nations General Assembly A/Res/65/206; A/Res/73/175, (2020)
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2022). What are Human Rights? ttps://www.ohchr.org/en/what-are-human-rights
United States v Burns, (2001)
Watson v The Queen, (2004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rico J. Yearwood, Stefan K. Newton
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
