Abuse of Human Rights in Myanmar: An Urgent Appeal to Reinterpret the ASEAN Non-Interference Principle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56784/hrgs.v1i2.12Keywords:
ASEAN, Human rights, Myanmar, Non-interference, SovereigntyAbstract
Myanmar highlights the international community's worry over ASEAN's failure to protect the human rights of the country's citizens. Numerous stakeholders, including scholars and observers, consider the non-interference principle as the bedrock for interstate relations in the region to be the greatest barrier to ASEAN's intervention in Myanmar. Using the method of doctrinal research, this article investigates the junction of the concept of non-interference as the spirit of state sovereignty and the principle of human rights in the context of Myanmar. This article claims that the reason why human rights cannot be enforced in ASEAN, as in the case of Myanmar, is because ASEAN adheres to the principle of non-interference in the traditional expression of state sovereignty, thereby making the state the dominant actor and denying the existence of people. This article proposes that ASEAN shift its understanding of state sovereignty from the traditional to the human rights perspective, which has become a universal view that places humans as the ultimate sovereigns of a country.
References
ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights. (2022). The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights. The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights, July. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790386
Philip Allott. (2001). New Order for a New World. OXFORD University Press.
Amnesty International. (2022a). Myanmar : ASEAN Must Kickstart Stalled Approach to Human Rights Crisis at US Summit. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/05/us-asean-summit-myanmar/
Amnesty International. (2022b). Myanmar : International Community must do more to Protect Brave Protesters. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/04/myanmar-coup-peaceful-protest/
Kofi Annan. (1999). Two Concepts of Sovereignty. The Economist.
Anwarul Yaqin. (2008). Legal Research and Writing Methods. LexisNexis Butterworths.
John Arendshorst. (2009). Dilemma of Non-Interference: Myanmar, Human Rights, and the ASEAN Charter, The. Nw. UJ Int’l Hum. Rts., 8(1), 102. http://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/jihr8§ion=7%5Cnhttp://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1095&context=njihr
ASEAN Secretariat. (2021). Chairman’s Statement on the ASEAN Leaders’ Meeting. ASEAN Secretariat. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/Chairmans-Statement-on-ALM-Five-Point-Consensus-24-April-2021-FINAL-a-1.pdf
Asia News Monitor. (2022). Myanmar rebuts oral update of Special Rapporteur on the situation of Human Rights in Myanmar at 50th session of Human Rights Council. Asia News Monitor. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2683715689/fulltext/EB3EEE4F61024632PQ/1?accountid=16746
Mohammed Ayoob. (2002). Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty. The International Journal of Human Rights, 6(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003751
Najimdeen Bakare, and Tatheer Zahra Sherazi. (2019). Is the European Union Evolving or Failing? Policy Perspectives, 16(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.11.2.0071
Alexander J Bellamy, and Catherine Drummond. (2011). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: between non-interference and sovereignty as responsibility. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.560958
P Iswara Bhat. (2020). Comparative Method of Legal Research: Nature, Process, and Potentiality in Idea and Methods of Legal Research.
Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Carolyn Reynolds, Sudarsan Raghavan, W Judson Dorman, & Melissa Sawin. (1993). Setting a New Agenda for the United Nations. Journal of International Affairs, 46(2), 289–298. http://content.ebscohost.com.library3.webster.edu/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=9306235191&S=R&D=afh&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeqLM4xNvgOLCmr0qep7NSrq+4SrCWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGut1G1qLdKuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA%5Cnhttp://library3.webster.edu/login?url=http://
Michael Byers, and Simon Chesterman. (2000). “You, the People”: pro-democratic intervention in international law (G. H. Fox & B. R. Roth (eds.)). Cambridge University Press.
Sealing Cheng. (2011). The Paradox of Vernacularization: Women’s Human Rights and the Gendering of Nationhood. Anthropological Quarterly. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108147767.009
Eric Corthay. (2016). The ASEAN Doctrine of Non-Interference in Light of the Fundamental Principle of Non-Intervention. In Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal (Vol. 17, Issue 2). http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/2016/09/APLPJ_17.2_Corthay_Final.pdf
Mathew Davies. (2013). The ASEAN Synthesis: Human Rights, Non-Intervention, and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 14(2), 51–58.
Jost Delbruck. (1982). International Protection of Human Rights and State Sovereignty. Indiana Law Journal, 57(4).
Martin Dixon, Robert McCorquodale, & Sarah Williams. (2003). Cases & Materials on International Law. OXFORD University Press.
Amy Doffegnies, and Tamas Wells. (2022). The Vernacularisation of Human Rights Discourse in Myanmar: Rejection, Hybridisation and Strategic Avoidance. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 52(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2020.1865432
Rodion Ebbighausen. (2021). Myanmar coup: ASEAN split over the way forward. https://www.dw.com/en/myanmar-coup-asean-ties/a-57042503
Efe News Service. (2022). Myanmar Refuses Access to UN Human Rights Investigator. EEF News Service. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1978600591/EB3EEE4F61024632PQ/5?accountid=16746
Thomas Martin Franck. (2000). Legitimacy and Democratic Entitlement. In G. H. Fox & B. R. Roth (Eds.). In Democratic Governance and International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Blom Hansen, and Finn Stepputat. (2006). Annual Review of Anthropology. Sovereignty Revisited, 35, 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123317
David J Harris. (1983). Cases and Materials on International Law. Sweet and Maxwell.
David Held. (2003). The Changing Structure of International Law. In A. David Held and McGrew (Ed.), The Global Transformations Reader: an Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2016.1219096
Louis Henkin. (1995). Human Rights and State Sovereignty. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 25(31), 540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/762217
Human Rights Watch. (2021). Myanmar: Serious Rights Abuses Persist No Justice for Ongoing Crimes Against Humanity, Apartheid. Hrw.Org. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/01/13/myanmar-serious-rights-abuses-persist#:~:text=(Bangkok) – The Myanmar government,in its World Report 2021.
Theo Huijibers. (1996). Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Kanisius.
Daniel Huizenga. (2021). The Right to Say No to Imposed Development: Human Rights Vernacularization in Reverse in South Africa. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 13(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab026
Human Rights Council. (2022). Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar Since 1 February 2021. Human Rights Council, 28. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/itgg.2008.3.2.189
International Commision on Intervation and State Sovereignty. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. ICISS.
The Irrawaddy. (2022). US Enforces Fresh Sanctions on Myanmar Junta and its Cronies. Www.Irrawaddy.Com. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/us-enforces-fresh-sanctions-on-myanmar-junta-and-its-cronies.html
Lee Jones. (2010). Asean’s Unchanged Melody? The Theory and Practice of “Non-Interference” in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review, 23(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2010.495996
William J Jones. (2017). Myanmar’s Rohingya: Human Rights Abuses and Systemic Violence. Journal of Urban Culture Research, 14, 16–33.
Ruukun Katanyuu. (2006). Beyond Non-Interference in ASEAN: The Association’s Role in Myanmar’s National Reconciliation and Democratization. Asian Survey, 46(6), 825–845. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2006.46.6.825
Hiro Katsumata. (2004). WHY IS ASEAN DIPLOMACY CHANGING? From “Non-Interference” to “Open and Frank Discussions.” Asian Survey, 44(2), 237–254.
Tun Khin. (2017). Rohingya: A preventable genocide allowed to happen. Insight Turkey, 19(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2017194.03
Nehginpao Kipgen. (2017). The Rohingya Conundrum.
Stephen D Krasner. (1988). Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414088021001004
Stephen D Krasner. (2001). Abiding sovereignty. International Political Science Review, 22(3), 229–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101223002
Chen Chen Lee. (2021). ASEAN Summit on Myanmar and the 5-Point Consensus. Asianlink.Unimelb.Edu.Au. https://asialink.unimelb.edu.au/insights/asean-summit-on-myanmar-and-the-5-point-consensus
Hui Ying Lee. (2021). Myanmar Coup: ASEAN’s Quiet Diplomacy is More Constructive. Https://Www.Lowyinstitute.Org/. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/myanmar-coup-asean-s-quiet-diplomacy-more-constructive
Karen T Litfin. (1997). Sovereignty in World Ecopolitics. Mershon International Studies Review, 41(2), 167–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/222667
Noel M Morada. (2018). ASEAN and Human Protection in Myanmar: From Non-Interference to Non-Indifference? In Regionalism and Human Protection. Brill | Nijhoff.
Sally Morphet. (2000). China as a Permanent Member of the Security Council: October 1971–December 1999. Security Dialogue, 31(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010600031002002
Al Mukarramah. (2021). The Governance Crisis in Myanmar: an International Law Perspective and International Society Response Towards Myanmar 2021.
Khin Nadi. (2022). How ASEAN’s Failed “Five-Point Consensus” Has Let Down the People of Myanmar. https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/analysis/aseans-failed-consensus-on-myanmar-a-year-of-broken-promises.html
Elaine Pearson. (2022). ASEAN Governments Need to Act on Myanmar. Hrw.Org. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/08/02/asean-governments-need-act-myanmar
Anne Peters. (2009). Humanity as the A and Ω of sovereignty. European Journal of International Law, 20(3), 513–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp026
Cekli Setya Pratiwi, Prischa Listiningrum, and Muhammad Anis Zhafran Al Anwary. (2022). Critiques on Contemporary Discourse of International Human Rights Law: a Global South Perspective. Human Rights in the Global South (HRGS), 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56784/hrgs.v1i1.3
Eddy Pratomo. (2009). Prospek Dan Tantangan Hukum Internasional Di Asean Dan Indonesia Pasca Piagam Asean Dari Sisi Perjanjian Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss1.art4
Jeremy A Rabkin. (2005). Recalling the Case for Sovereignty. Chicago Journal of International Law, 5(2), 435–460. http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/cjil5§ion=34
Rachminawati, and Khairil Azmin Mokhtar. (2019). Protection of Human Rights in Southeast Asia With Special Reference To the Rohingya in Myanmar: a Critical Study of the Effect of Asean’S Policy and Action on Asean Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (Aichr). Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 3(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.23920/pjil.v3i2.315
Robin Ramcharan. (2000). ASEAN and Non-interference: A Principle Maintained. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22(1), 60–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1355/cs22_1c
Raynova. (2017). Towards a Common Understanding of the Non- Intervention Principle. In European Leadership Network.
Michael W Reisman. (1990). Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 84(4), 866–876. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2202838
Christian Reus-Smit. (2001). Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty. Review of International Studies, 27(4), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210501005198
Allan Rosas. (1995). State Sovereignty and Human Rights: towards a Global Constitutional Project. Political Studies, 43, 61–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01736.x
Mohamad Rosyidin. (2020). Reconciling State’s Sovereignty with Global Norms: Indonesia’s Quiet Diplomacy in Myanmar and the Feasibility of the Implementation of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Southeast Asia. Global Responsibility to Protect, 12(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-01201003
Nico Schrijver. (2000). The Changing Nature of State Sovereignty. British Yearbook of International Law, 70(1), 65–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/70.1.65
Georg Schwarzenberger and E D Brown. (1976). A Manual of International Law (sixth edit). In Professional Books Limited.
Andrew Selth. (2018). The Rohingya question: determining who to hold to account In Interpreting Myanmar. ANU Press.
Fithriatus Shalihah, and Muhammad Raka Fiqri. (2020). Overview of Human Rights Violations Against Rohingya Ethnicity in Burma and Uighur Tribe in China in International Law Perspectives. 121(Inclar 2019), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.010
Hans Steinmüller. (2022). Sovereignty as Care: Acquaintances, Mutuality, and Scale in the Wa State of Myanmar. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 64(4), 910–933. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417522000299
Dio Herdiawan Tobing. (2018). The Limits and Possibilities of the ASEAN Way: The Case of Rohingya as Humanitarian Issue in Southeast Asia. KnE Social Sciences, 3(5), 148. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i5.2331
Muhammad Bahrul Ulum. (2022). Sovereignty and Legal Personality: a Lesson From European Union’S Evolution To Supranationalism. Lampung Journal of International Law, 4(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v3i2.2517
United States Department of State. (2021). Burma 2021 Human Rights Report. United States Department of State, September 2018, 1–45. https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/burma/
Mark Van Hoecke. (2016). Methodology of Comparative Legal Research. Law and Method, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.5553/rem/.000010
Carrie Booth Walling. (2015). Human rights norms, state sovereignty, and humanitarian intervention. Human Rights Quarterly, 37(2), 383–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2015.0034
Yukawa. (2018). The ASEAN Way as a symbol: an analysis of discourses on the ASEAN Norms. The Pacific Review, 31(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1371211
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Saru Arifin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
